The Rookie Lawyer
06/05/2026
Universal Music Group (UMG) can best be summarised in the (paraphrased) words of pop star Chappell Roan – herself signed to a record label owned by the company – as your favourite artist's favourite entertainment company. From Taylor Swift to Kendrick Lamar, UMG is the world's largest music company: reportedly home to nine of the top ten global recording artists in 2025. However, with the increasing reliance on platforms such as Spotify and Apple Music for royalty revenues, growth in the music streaming market has been slower than anticipated.
It's this slowed growth – combined with UMG's stock underperformance – that has prompted Pershing Square, a prominent US investment firm, to propose a takeover of UMG.
On 7 April, Pershing Square proposed a takeover of UMG, outlining a plan to address the company’s stock price underperformance and improve shareholder returns. The proposal involves merging UMG with Pershing Square SPARC Holdings, a new investment vehicle, to create a newly US-listed entity.
To understand SPARCs (special purpose acquisition rights companies), it helps to start with their predecessor: SPACs (special purpose acquisition companies). SPACs are shell companies that raise capital through an initial public offering (IPO) with the intention of merging with a private company. Investors commit funds to the SPAC without knowing the eventual target, with the capital held in trust until a target company is identified. If no deal is completed within a set timeframe, funds are returned to investors. If successful, however, SPACs offer investors a faster route to public markets and early-stage investment opportunities.
Yet SPACs aren't without criticism. Returns have often fallen short of expectations set during promotion, and the structure requires investors to commit capital upfront without any certainty as to how it'll be used.
SPARCs, developed by Pershing, aim to address these issues. Like SPACs, they're shell companies designed to merge with private companies. Unlike SPACs, however, SPARCs don't raise capital in advance. Instead, investors commit funds only once a specific deal has been identified, reducing the risks associated with speculative early-stage bets.
However, as a relatively new structure, SPARCs remain untested at scale. The proposed UMG transaction would serve as a significant test of their viability.
UMG?
The takeover would result in a restructuring and re-listing of UMG in the US, shifting its primary listing from Amsterdam to the New York Stock Exchange. This could broaden access to US markets, which tend to place higher valuations on media and intellectual property (IP) driven businesses – which could, in turn, raise the company's share price.
SPARCs?
A successful transaction would help legitimise SPARCs as a credible alternative to traditional IPOs and SPACs. In turn, this could encourage regulatory acceptance and wider adoption of similar investment structures.
The music industry?
The deal reinforces the growing perception of music as an asset class. Driven by streaming and licensing opportunities – particularly on platforms like TikTok – music rights are increasingly viewed as attractive institutional investments. The involvement of a major player like UMG indicates continued investor interest in the sector.
A transaction of this nature would draw from multiple practice areas:
So, whether you’re deep in the trenches of training contract applications or only just starting to build your commercial awareness, this deal is a reminder that law sits at the centre of evolving industries. Music may be creative at its core, but its future is being shaped by finance, technology and regulation – and lawyers play a key role in connecting all three.