University: Trinity College, Cambridge
Degree: History
Year of call: 2023
Position: Barrister
I’m not sure I’d make a very good solicitor and I never considered it. Being a barrister, with its attractive combination (at least typically) of self-employment and constant variety, was the only option I considered. I don’t think I’d be anywhere near as good at client management as my instructing solicitors are!
I did – in fact I did rather too many of them, which I wouldn’t recommend. I’d say trying to do between four to six mini-pupillages is a good idea and, even if you think you’re sure about your practice area, to inject some variety into those choices.
Do bear in mind that obtaining mini-pupillages can be very competitive – I was rejected for a fair few over some time, but don’t let that get you down. The opportunities will come if you stick at it and look closely at what the chambers says it's looking for.
As a non-lawyer, applying during my law conversion, a very difficult part of the process was when there was a legal problem question. Some chambers, aware of the variety of applicants, would give you all the ‘law’ you needed to deal with the problem. Others, perhaps reasonably, assumed you already had a lot of law under your belt – it was hard to deal with the unknown unknowns!
There was an enormous variety of work during my pupillage but broadly speaking my first six months were focused on shipping work. My second six months were spent more on construction and being on my feet doing my own matters.
All in all, I was dealing with contract issues first and foremost, although professional negligence and civil fraud quickly came into the picture, especially following a positive tenancy decision.
Chambers was very helpful in making sure pupils got to have a real life during those 12 months. Pupillage can be incredibly stressful – it certainly helped to be told by the head of the tenancy committee that they expected us to keep to a 9:00am to 6:30pm timetable and take proper time for lunch. It was also made clear that working beyond those hours was not encouraged – and indeed could be viewed as proof that one could not handle the workload in the time available.
On top of that, we were entitled to plan our holidays early and co-ordinate them with pupil supervisors.
As a commercial barrister, no day is typical. This week, I’m reviewing disclosure in relation to a multi-million construction dispute, drafting pleadings in respect of a commercial dispute about software, drafting skeleton arguments, as well as acting in an application to strike-out a claim.
Some things are more routine – trying to squeeze in a walk in Inner Temple’s beautiful garden, speaking to the clerks and chatting through the thornier issues (theirs or yours) with colleagues.
There are three skills which I think are most helpful: structured thinking, attention to detail and a practical interest in advocacy.
Structured thinking helps you realise not just the right answers to the questions asked, but also what the right questions might be.
Attention to detail means one’s less likely to grasp the wrong end of the stick from limited information.
Practical advocacy means thinking about what the tribunal is really going to find helpful – it’s very rare that that’s a grandiloquent speech or a recitation of huge quantities of case law. Often, it’s a helpful summary of facts or to help bring them to the most pertinent documents in a bundle.
Ultimately, at the Bar, work/life balance is a matter for the individual. What I’m grateful for is to be at a chambers where my clerks are chasing me to book leave, rather than to be chasing them or persuading them I should get time off.
Equally, having recently become a father, I’ve been grateful at the level of support from my clerks in shifting to a practice where I work more from home (at least for the moment).
Generally, in any given year, there will be times where you feel like you’re getting the balance wrong – one way or the other – but I certainly think in aggregate, and perhaps even on the average day, the work/life balance compares favourably to those instructing me!
The wider culture of chambers is extremely collegiate. All the stereotypical statements are true – you do feel you can knock on people’s doors, people are very supportive and the clerking is attentive to how one wants to develop one’s practice. There’s a real sense we’re all pulling together in the same direction.
Every other week there are chambers drinks, as well as a bimonthly rotation of chambers lunch or chambers tea and cake. Most days somebody is around to go to hall with and chambers social functions are always enormously good fun. Around Christmas, a chambers choir pops up to sing carols – although, I must confess, I wouldn’t make the cut!
Friendly, ambitious, excellent.
Through my Inn, I’m very proud to have been selected for a Pegasus Scholarship. This’ll mean I spend four weeks working in Bermuda, getting to know about a different jurisdiction – its unique features, and its similarities with English law. There also could be some enjoying of the island life – I’m not counting any chickens yet.
Iain Pearson’s Stone’s Fall – an excellent novel, almost as good as his An Instance of the Fingerpost. I’ve also just finished a couple of curious books about cricket: Chinaman by Shehan Karunatilaka and Miles Jupp’s Fibber in the Heat.